Cleveland v. United States (2000)

Cleveland v. United States
Argued October 10, 2000
Decided November 7, 2000
Full case nameCarl W. Cleveland, Petitioner v. United States
Citations531 U.S. 12 (more)
121 S. Ct. 365, 148 L. Ed. 2d 221, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 7436
Case history
Priormotion to dismiss denied, 951 F.Supp. 1249 (E.D. La. 1997); defendants convicted and forfeiture ordered, unreported (E.D. La. 1997); affirmed sub. nom. U.S. v. Bankston, 182 F.3d 296 (5th Cir. 1999); certiorari granted, 529 U.S. 1017 (2000)
Holding
"Property" for the purposes of federal law does not include state video poker licenses. Fifth circuit reversed and remanded.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinion
MajorityGinsburg, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
18 U.S.C. § 1341

Cleveland v. United States, 531 U.S. 12 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case that concerned the definition of "property" under the federal mail fraud statute. In a unanimous decision, the Court held that "property" for the purposes of federal law did not include state video poker licences because such transactions were not a vested right or expectation.


© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search